Provide Safe Water by Law: Now

Safe water is something that everyone should have access to. Could we not enshrine in law the effort to provide safe water.

There are various organisations sinking bore holes and wells; they are not necessarily the appropriate answer to people's water supply problems. In some areas the ground water becomes easily polluted by natural means and the bore holes and wells in those areas soon become worthless. This is not good enough: we must learn by these mistaken efforts to help and proceed with a more sustainable approach.

Law could provide the funds necessary to make the supply of safe water effective and widespread. We are spending millions on the exploration of space yet many people are dying because of the state of their water or because they do not have sufficient to survive.

Do you want the law to intervene in this way? I do.

Flexible Approach to Law

You may have noticed that the Archbishop of Canterbury has recently suggested that British law could be made to have a more flexible approach toward religious nuance. While many people have ranted and raved at the mention of Islamic Law few people managed to contemplate what the Old Bish actually suggested which was, in my view at least, a relatively mild alteration of the view of law in order to cater more for matters of religious conscience which differ from the broadly Christian ethic that most British law is based on. As a basic idea, I see nothing wrong with this except that if such flexibility was to allow for cultural nuance rather than merely religious nuance it would make more sense within the modern democratic framework of upholding the rights of minorities.

But, of course, this frightens many people into thinking that the law would become too fragmented with a world full of people with their own ideas of what laws should govern them. It doesn't have to be very complicated; you set criteria which governs what flexibility is allowed and as long as the claiment's preference does not fall outside the criteria then it is valid in law. You don't necessarily have to keep extensive records of all sorts of differing ideas.

Some law already works in this way despite claims that there can be no flexibility where "core values" are concerned; unfortunately for those that claim this, they are already in error.

And on the subject of Christian values, I am not a Christian(or a muslim) and would prefer my government to be based from secular concerns while catering for religious and cultural differences as far as is practicle, instead of things being the other way around.